Babygate: the Left Forces Palin's Daughter to Reveal Pregnancy

Posted by Bear at 9/1/2008 12:07 PM
Categories: uncategorized
The Left is not called looney without ample reason.  Recently leftist bloggers tried to claim that Sarah Palin's recent pregnancy was faked to cover up for her daughter's pregnancy.  That would have meant that the down syndrome baby, Trig, was her daughter's and not Sarah Palin's.  Oh, how the left would have jumped with glee had that been true, just like Democrats were happy when it found out hurricane Gustav was bearing down on the US at the time of the Republican National Convention.  Isn't it disgusting how the left makes political use of disastrous situations?  They will stop at nothing to win an election.  In any case, as Townhall points out in response to the picture exposing the alleged lie:

Not only is the DailyKos disgustingly inspecting Bristol's midriff with all the fervor of LA paparazzi examining J-Lo's or Jennifer Aniston's washboard stomachs for evidence of a "bump," the DailyKos is wrong on when the photo was taken. It was taken, and published, by the Anchorage Daily News in 2006. Baby Trig, a child with Down's Syndrome, was born on April 18, 2008. That's a long time for a teen girl to be carrying a "bump" which looks nothing more than the curve of a tight sweater. 

Now, because the left is pressing the issue, Palin, to rebut the rumors, had to reveal to the world that her daughter, Bristol, 17 years old, is pregnant.  As Palin herself stated:

"Our beautiful daughter Bristol came to us with news that as parents we knew would make her grow up faster than we had ever planned. As Bristol faces the responsibilities of adulthood, she knows she has our unconditional love and support," the Palins said.

The Palins asked the news media to respect the young couple's privacy.

First of all, compare that statement to Barack's statements about his daughters being punished with a child at such an age:

Will the Messiah come out and say that Palin is punishing her daughter with a baby, the point being that the daughter should have an abortion instead?  I wouldn't put it past him.  The difference in philosophical approaches to birth is glaring.  One side believes having a baby at any age is a blessing, even if it will be difficult to raise it.  The other side sees birth as a burden and punishment, preferring to abort the "burden."  Even if the so-called burden survives the abortion, Obama, based on his record in Illinois is okay with infanticide.  All because it would burden the original choice to kill the baby. 

The other issue here is privacy.  Will the Left, so staunch in its assertions of privacy when it comes to a woman's choice, respect the privacy of Bristol Palin?  Highly unlikely.  It is always a double standard when it comes to this happening to a conservative.  Case in point, the affair of John Edwards.  It only took the media years to swing into action on that story.  The media will write in this case, "ha, conservative hypocrits!  Her own daughter got pregnant at 17.  How conservative is that?"  You see, the Left fails to realize that just because you have moral standards doesn't mean you will always live up to them.  This stems from the belief that humans are deeply flawed and will err.  That does not mean you don't promote good moral standards at all.  For the Left it is better to not have such burdensome standards.

Lastly, the Left would be without its Messiah, the One from Hope and Change, Illinois, had Obama's mother not decided to give birth to him at the age of 17.  Where would the world be if she had decided Obama was "punishment?"  This won't stop criticism from the Left, blind in its pursuit for the White House and hatred for George Bush.  Hypocrisy is no impediment for the Left.   

Check us out: thejtandbearshow.com/Audio.html

 

Check out the latest show:

The JT and Bear Show 08.24.08

Check out Bear performing the parody of Obama, Obamalujah, on Youtube:

Obamalujah

Email us: jtandbear@thejtandbearshow.com


Check out our myspace: http://www.myspace.com/jtandbearshow


Join our facebook group: http://www.facebook.com/groups.php?ref=sb#/group.php?gid=15305890845


   

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • 9/1/2008 1:31 PM Obamalujah wrote:
    Babygate: the Left Forces Palin's Daughter to Reveal Pregnancy The Left is not called looney without ample reason. Recently leftist bloggers tried to claim that Sarah Palin's recent pregnancy was faked to cover up for her daughter's pregnancy....
  • 9/1/2008 1:08 PM Right Truth wrote:
    Palin Announces Daughter’s Pregnancy. Good for Sarah Palin for getting this new out. She should have done this in her acceptance speech so the Kos followers would not have started the vile rumors that were picked up as truth. We offer our prayers to the Palin family. Again, ... they chose LIFE. What will we call parents like the Palins??? GRANDPARENTS!
Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)
Page: 1 of 1
  • 9/1/2008 2:03 PM CKA in Red State USA wrote:
    Please, this is not "babygate" or any such political hoo-hah. Please, do not advertise this so, thus validating the crassness and lewdness of what the Demockacrats, liberals and leftists have and continue to do today.

    Please, let them live in that sewer.

    But do not add insult to Gov. Palin and her family.

    Please.
    Reply to this
  • 9/1/2008 2:17 PM Reagansmash wrote:
    I think it's pretty clear the author is condemning the left, not giving into its antics.
    Reply to this
  • 9/1/2008 2:33 PM CKA in Red State USA wrote:
    I know, Reagansmash.

    But words have power and I've just had enough of the garbage that the Demockacrats, liberals and leftists have been spouting.

    "Enough is enough" was behind my comment.

    That does not mean I don't appreciate this blog and what it presents.

    Just fatigued by the politicization of everything, especially by the viciousness and crassness exemplified by the DLLs.
    Reply to this
  • 9/1/2008 2:38 PM Reagansmash wrote:
    That's fair. I think the author is tired too. Hell, we are all tired of this.
    Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.