WSJ Claims Paulson Plan will Make Money for Taxpayer



First of all, the title of the WSJ article is misleading.  The Paulson plan will not make money for the taxpayer.  It will make money for the same government that got us into this mess in the first place.  Andy Kessler writes: 

My analysis suggests that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson (a former investment banker, no less, not a trader) may pull off the mother of all trades, which could net a trillion dollars and maybe as much as $2.2 trillion -- yes, with a "t" -- for the United States Treasury. 

The operative word here is "could."  Does anyone really believe that the government, if it somehow manages to make a profit on the Paulson plan, will just hand the money back to the taxpayer?  And if the plan doesn't work?  Then the plan will cost the taxpayer money, and the government will come knocking on our doors with the coercive power of the state to collect in order to pay for the original bad decision.  It never knocks on the door and just hands back such a "windfall" as Andy Kessler suggests.

Let's say Andy Kessler is right in the following situation:

Taxpayers will get their money back on AIG. My models suggest that Fannie and Freddie, on the other hand, are a gold mine. For $2 billion in cash up front and some $200 billion in loan guarantees so far, the U.S. government now controls $5.4 trillion in mortgages and mortgage guarantees.

Fannie and Freddie each own around $800 million in mortgage loans, some of them already at discounted values. They also guarantee the credit-worthiness of another $2.2 trillion and $1.6 trillion in mortgage-backed securities. Held to maturity, they may be worth a lot more than Mr. Paulson paid for them. They're called distressed securities for a reason.

You can slice the numbers a lot of different ways. My calculations, which assume 50% impairment on subprime loans, suggest it is possible, all in, for this portfolio to generate between $1 trillion and $2.2 trillion -- the greatest trade ever. Every hedge-fund manager will be jealous. Mr. Buffett is buying a small piece of the trade via his Goldman Sachs investment.

Over 10 years this could change the budget scenario in D.C., which can also strengthen the dollar. The next president gets a heck of a windfall. In the spirit of Secretary of State William Seward's purchase of Alaska for $7 million in 1867, this week may be remembered as Paulson's Folly.

Just because the government may make trillions of dollars for itself does not mean that the intrusion into the market is warranted.  Why on Earth are we as taxpayers supposed to take on such a massive liability for the same problems the government created?  What about the long-term damage a bailout can cause to the free market?  Are the increased regulations of the anything-but-free market by faceless Washington bureaucrats worth it?  How can we have faith in Washington to oversee the market properly when crony capitalism caused this crisis in the first place?  Washington created these semi-government, semi-private businesses to give out risky loans to high risk lendees, and now Washington expects the American taxpayer to pay for its bad decisions.  I say no.    

This whole crisis is sickening.  I never ever thought I'd see the day when George Bush, a supposedly fiscal conservative, and Bill Clinton, a big spending liberal, would agree.  George Bush said the free market isn't functioning properly.  I say it is.  Businesses that weren't performing properly in the market are getting punished for bad behavior.  The market is functioning perfectly.  If  it is true that the companies were involved in shady practices, why should we reward them with a bailout?  What Bush should've said is the government isn't functioning properly.  I can't even figure out which party is for small government anymore.  If there are any conservative/libertarians left in Congress, now is the time for them to fight for the American taxpayer.  When will people learn that we are better off when Congress fails to act?  We don't need to be the greatest country on the planet.  We need to be the freest country.  That alone is what makes us great, not excessive government regulation.  I just wonder who will bail the government out with the coming crisis in social security, which will trump this "crisis" beyond belief?




Check us out: thejtandbearshow.com/Audio.html 

Check out the latest show:

The JT and Bear Show09.14.08

Check out Obamalujah and Red, White, and Blue on Youtube:





Discuss the issues in our new forum: 

Ground Zero

Email us: jtandbear@thejtandbearshow.com

Checkout our myspace: http://www.myspace.com/jtandbearshow

Join our facebook group: http://www.facebook.com/groups.php?ref=sb#/group.php?gid=15305890845

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.