WSJ Claims Paulson Plan will Make Money for Taxpayer
First of all, the title of the WSJ article is misleading. The Paulson plan will not make money for the taxpayer. It will make money for the same government that got us into this mess in the first place. Andy Kessler writes:
My analysis suggests that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson (a former investment banker, no less, not a trader) may pull off the mother of all trades, which could net a trillion dollars and maybe as much as $2.2 trillion -- yes, with a "t" -- for the United States Treasury.
The operative word here is "could." Does anyone really believe that the government, if it somehow manages to make a profit on the Paulson plan, will just hand the money back to the taxpayer? And if the plan doesn't work? Then the plan will cost the taxpayer money, and the government will come knocking on our doors with the coercive power of the state to collect in order to pay for the original bad decision. It never knocks on the door and just hands back such a "windfall" as Andy Kessler suggests.
Let's say Andy Kessler is right in the following situation:
Taxpayers will get their money back on AIG. My models suggest that Fannie and Freddie, on the other hand, are a gold mine. For $2 billion in cash up front and some $200 billion in loan guarantees so far, the U.S. government now controls $5.4 trillion in mortgages and mortgage guarantees.
Fannie and Freddie each own around $800 million in mortgage loans, some of them already at discounted values. They also guarantee the credit-worthiness of another $2.2 trillion and $1.6 trillion in mortgage-backed securities. Held to maturity, they may be worth a lot more than Mr. Paulson paid for them. They're called distressed securities for a reason.
You can slice the numbers a lot of different ways. My calculations, which assume 50% impairment on subprime loans, suggest it is possible, all in, for this portfolio to generate between $1 trillion and $2.2 trillion -- the greatest trade ever. Every hedge-fund manager will be jealous. Mr. Buffett is buying a small piece of the trade via his Goldman Sachs investment.
Over 10 years this could change the budget scenario in D.C., which can also strengthen the dollar. The next president gets a heck of a windfall. In the spirit of Secretary of State William Seward's purchase of Alaska for $7 million in 1867, this week may be remembered as Paulson's Folly.
Check us out: thejtandbearshow.com/Audio.html
Check out the latest show:
The JT and Bear Show09.14.08
Check out Obamalujah and Red, White, and Blue on Youtube:
Discuss the issues in our new forum:
Ground Zero
Email us: jtandbear@thejtandbearshow.com
Checkout our myspace: http://www.myspace.com/jtandbearshow
Join our facebook group: http://www.facebook.com/groups.php?ref=sb#/group.php?gid=15305890845








Comments